Non-core promises
We’re about a month away from the WA State Election. It will almost certainly be held on 19 February, and the WAEC says if that’s the case then it must be called by Thursday.
There’s no doubt that the Coalition is going to try to run on the “Howard Halo”. Why wouldn’t they? Opposition Leader Colin Barnett is barely respected by his own caucus, let alone the public. If they’re going to run a personality-based campaign, they need to draft some talent. Howard fits the bill, and if Labor’s leadership difficulties are not fixed soon the halo will only grow.
The other alternative is to run on policies that are of clear benefit to the electors and the State, but even senior shadow ministers admit they’re not able to do that. In today’s West Australian, Steve Pennells tries to make sense of the Opposition’s (non-)commitments to date (p7). He can’t succeed, but does get them to admit their duplicity.
Nationals leader Max Trenorden plants one arse-cheek on each side of the fence: “When you say it is a policy it is a bit hard to alter it.” Shadow health minister Dan Sullivan joins him: “If I said everything on there was policy, I would be lying … we don’t want to lock ourselves in.” Shadow police minister Matt Birney, on the other hand, is sure they’re bona fide promises. Barnett’s office refused to comment — perhaps they couldn’t work it out.
This is Howard’s “non-core promise” writ large. This is making promises to every interest group under the sun, but refusing to back them up with a firm commitment. Is it any wonder the Coalition’s unfunded “positions” — we can’t say “policies” — have already topped $6 billion? There is simply no way they can uphold all of their “positions” and cut taxes and deliver larger surpluses. You can’t trust anything they’ve said.
We’re not talking about the typical “small target” ploy of holding back policies until the campaign formally kicks off. The Coalition hasn’t even had private meetings to discuss policy with its staunchest backer, the Chamber of Commerce and Industry. CEO John Langoulant says, “It would be different if a large part of the Barnett cabinet were known to us but a lot of it isn’t known to us. There is great uncertainty.”
The Gallop Government hasn’t been perfect, but it’s been steady, measured and largely effective. As a result, people are flocking to WA — the population topped 2 million this month — and the economy is the strongest in the country. On 19 February, we can return Geoff Gallop to the helm, or we can elect a rabble that says all its commitments are non-core promises.

Great post, and I just hope the people of Perth realise that the Gallop government has achieved all it has done in just a single term. It has definitely done enough to deserve another.
As you say, the Libs simply have no plan, nor a vision to improve the State.
Lathams just stepped down as leader, as well as announcing quitting politics all together citing health reasons. Its a damn shame and I hope he gets better without the stress of continual berating.
Looks like Kimbos back… hopefully stability will once again come back to the labor party .
The WA Labor Premier is accused by the shoppies union boss as a man without principal for supporting liberalised trading laws. At the same time, the Liberal party is “offside with traditional allies in the business community” according to Pennells (minus small businesses who currently enjoy a legislated competitive advantage over their larger rivals).
What a curious election.